CFTC's Proposed Prediction-Markets Rule Reaches White House OMB Review; Trump Posts Public Support
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission submitted a formal proposed rule for prediction-market regulation to the White House Office of Management and Budget on May 26, 2026. President Trump posted explicit support on social media, framing CFTC exclusive jurisdiction as critical infrastructure for the industry.
The Commodity Futures Trading Commission submitted a formal proposed rule for prediction-market regulation to the White House Office of Management and Budget on May 26, 2026. The OMB Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs (OIRA) review is the standard final step before a federal agency rule is published for public comment in the Federal Register. The text of the proposed rule has not been made public; the CFTC declined to comment until the review process is complete. Publication is typically 60 to 120 days after OIRA review begins, putting an expected Federal Register notice in late summer or early fall 2026.
The substance matters because the rule will provide the legal infrastructure under which every CFTC argument in its six pending state preemption suits is being made. Currently the agency is leaning on the Commodity Exchange Act's grant of exclusive jurisdiction over derivatives listed on a Designated Contract Market, supplemented by individual product self-certifications by Kalshi and others. A formal rule would do three things: codify a clear category for event contracts as commodity derivatives; specify the operational and compliance standards platforms must meet; and establish enforcement protocols the CFTC can use without relying on the courts to apply pre-existing statutes. Federal preemption arguments become stronger when the agency has its own clearly articulated regulatory regime, not just statutory authority.
President Trump posted explicit support for CFTC jurisdiction on his social-media account in the same week: "It is critically important that the CFTC's exclusive authority over Prediction Markets is maintained, and that they will thrive." The post is a meaningful reversal from his April 24 comment describing the broader prediction-market industry as "something of a casino." Industry observers read the pivot as reflecting the consolidation of administration support around Chairman Michael Selig's framework: Selig has personally argued in press releases that state laws like Minnesota's SF 4760 turn lawful operators into felons overnight, and the president is now publicly aligned with that framing. Donald Trump Jr. remains a strategic advisor to Kalshi and an investor in Polymarket through 1789 Capital; the administration's position should be read against that backdrop.
What the rule does not do is end the state fights. Even with formal CFTC regulations on the books, state attorneys general can continue to argue (as Minnesota's Keith Ellison and Rhode Island's Peter Neronha are doing) that gambling-law authority is a traditional state police power that survives federal regulation of commodity derivatives. That argument is weaker after the rule than before, but it does not vanish. The realistic timeline is: OIRA review through summer, Federal Register publication around October, public comment period through year-end, final rule in early 2027. By that point the Arizona preliminary injunction will have produced an Eighth Circuit appellate ruling, and at least one of the other five state cases (Minnesota is the leading candidate) will likely have produced its own preliminary injunction order. The federal regulatory frame and the federal courts will be moving on roughly parallel tracks.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi's Parlays Drive Back-to-Back $5B Days — and Hand Critics Their Strongest Argument
Kalshi traded a record $5.33 billion on November 7 and $5.36 billion on November 8, with multi-leg parlay-style 'combos' making up roughly 75% of both days' volume. Its 30-day volume topped $100 billion. But the parlay dominance cuts against the platform's legal defense: parlays are a quintessential sportsbook product, and the American Gaming Association has told the Second Circuit that parlays make up about two-thirds of Kalshi's volume and should be treated as sports bets. The implied house edge on 10-plus-leg combos is around 25%, undercutting the argument that these are neutral financial instruments rather than gambling.
Cruz Bill Would Require State or Tribal Approval for Sports Contracts — a Bipartisan Legislative Threat Emerges
Senator Ted Cruz, who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, is preparing a bill that would bar federally regulated prediction markets from offering gambling-tied event contracts, including sports, unless a state or tribal government authorizes them. It would not ban the contracts nationwide but would require platforms to obtain approval jurisdiction by jurisdiction, resembling state-by-state sportsbook regulation. The proposal arrives as Democrats take control of both chambers after the midterms, creating a potential bipartisan reckoning: a Republican committee chair and a newly skeptical Democratic majority both eyeing restrictions on a sector that had relied on federal protection.
CFTC Tells Platforms to Stop Geofencing States — Directly Colliding With State Court Orders
The CFTC issued an interpretation on November 5 of its 'impartial access' core principle, telling regulated exchanges including Kalshi and Polymarket to drop state-by-state geographic blocks within 30 days or explain why they cannot. The demand collides head-on with existing state court orders that require the platforms to geofence: Washington ordered Kalshi to geofence in August, and Michigan ordered it to use licensed geolocation to block the state in September, with a $500,000 daily fine for violations. Chairman Michael Selig framed the interpretation as a uniformity requirement. The platforms are now caught between a federal demand to unblock states and state court orders to block them.