Fed Hikes 25bp for First Time Since 2023 — Prediction Markets Priced It at 81% vs CME Futures at 64%
The Federal Reserve raised its benchmark rate 25 basis points to 3.75%-4% on September 16 — the first increase since 2023 — in a 12-0 unanimous vote. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh said inflation remains too high, driven in part by energy prices. The dot plot showed 16 of 18 officials expect at least one more hike before year-end. Prediction markets on Kalshi priced the September hike at 81% going into the decision; CME fed funds futures implied a 64% probability. The gap reinforces a recurring pattern in 2026: prediction markets have consistently assigned higher probabilities to rate hikes than CME futures, and have been correct.
The Federal Open Market Committee voted 12-0 on September 16 to raise the federal funds rate target by 25 basis points to 3.75%-4.00%, the first rate increase since the Fed's 2023 tightening cycle ended. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, delivering the post-meeting press conference, said inflation 'remains elevated' and attributed persistent price pressures in part to high energy costs. The updated Summary of Economic Projections — the dot plot — showed that 16 of 18 FOMC participants expected at least one additional hike at either the November or December 2026 meetings, with four officials projecting two more increases before year-end. Markets priced further tightening immediately: two-year Treasury yields rose sharply, the dollar strengthened, and both equity and credit markets fell on the more hawkish-than-anticipated dot plot.
Kalshi's prediction market on the September FOMC outcome had priced the 25bp hike at 81% going into the meeting. CME Group's FedWatch tool, derived from fed funds futures pricing, implied a 64% probability of the same outcome at the same time. The 17-percentage-point gap is not unique to this meeting: Kalshi has consistently priced higher probabilities of rate hikes than CME futures throughout 2026. In July, when CME implied roughly 26% probability of a September hike, Kalshi showed approximately 47%. By September 14, the day before the decision, Kalshi was at 81% and CME at 64%. The gap narrowed over time as the decision approached, but Kalshi maintained a persistently higher hike probability throughout the forecasting window — and proved more accurate. Academic research on prediction markets versus futures-implied probabilities has generally found that prediction markets aggregate information differently and can lead futures pricing on rate decisions by days or weeks.
The mechanics behind the divergence are debated. One explanation is that CME fed funds futures are used extensively for hedging, which introduces a risk premium that biases the implied probability away from pure expectation — a trader who wants to hedge against a hike will buy contracts that increase in value if rates rise, pushing the futures price toward pricing a higher rate probability even if the trader does not personally believe a hike is more likely than not. Prediction markets, by contrast, are closer to pure probability contracts with no physical delivery or hedging demand, which means the price should more directly reflect participants' collective probability estimate. Whether the Kalshi market's structural cleanliness or its participant base's informational advantage drove the September gap is not determinable from the price alone, but the outcome validates the higher Kalshi probability over the CME futures signal on this particular call.
The Fed hike's broader implications are relevant to prediction markets beyond the forecasting validation. Higher rates increase the cost of capital for early-stage companies, which matters for Kalshi and Polymarket US as private companies with ongoing fundraising needs and expansion plans. A second hike before year-end — which the dot plot suggests is likely — would further tighten financial conditions. On the other hand, a higher-rate environment historically generates more trading interest in rate-sensitive financial products, and Kalshi's economic and Fed-decision markets have been among its highest-volume non-sports categories. The next FOMC meeting is scheduled for October 28-29, 2026, which falls during the NFL regular season's peak and one week before the November 3 congressional midterm elections — a date that will concentrate prediction market volume in Fed, political, and sports categories simultaneously.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi Suspends Congressional Candidate for Trading on Own Race — Senate Already Banned Members
Kalshi disclosed on August 31 that it suspended North Carolina congressional candidate Laurie Buckhout for three years and fined her $2,589 for trading on her own race — the first publicly known enforcement action against a candidate for prediction market insider trading. Kalshi said it found multiple politicians trading on races they were involved in, including former Congressman George Santos. The Senate had unanimously banned its members and staffers from prediction market trading on April 30. CNN published a major feature on September 24 documenting election officials' concerns about disinformation and insider trading risk from prediction markets as the midterms approach.
Pew Research: Prediction Market Volume Doubled May-July, Sports Now Largest Category
A Pew Research Center analysis published September 23 found that combined monthly trading volume on Kalshi and Polymarket more than doubled from May to July 2026 — rising from $26 billion in May to $53 billion in July — driven primarily by sports contracts. Sports is now the largest trading category on both platforms. During the FIFA World Cup in June and July, Kalshi's monthly sports volume reached $58 billion. Over the same period, Americans wagered roughly $40 billion at licensed sportsbooks — suggesting prediction market sports volume has approached or exceeded licensed sports betting in dollar terms.
Democrats Now 60% Senate, 90% House Favorites on Prediction Markets — Biggest Shift Since 2024
Prediction markets on Kalshi and Polymarket have moved decisively toward Democratic control of both congressional chambers in the 2026 midterms. Democrats are priced at approximately 60% to win Senate control (Republicans 40%) and roughly 90% to win House control as of September 21. Republicans had been at 80%+ in Senate control markets when the market opened in November 2024. The shift began in February 2026 following the Iran war and has accelerated through fall as rising gas prices pushed Trump's approval ratings lower. More than 500 active midterm markets are live across Kalshi and Polymarket combined.