Fed Hikes 25bp for First Time Since 2023 — Prediction Markets Priced It at 81% vs CME Futures at 64%
The Federal Reserve raised its benchmark rate 25 basis points to 3.75%-4% on September 16 — the first increase since 2023 — in a 12-0 unanimous vote. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh said inflation remains too high, driven in part by energy prices. The dot plot showed 16 of 18 officials expect at least one more hike before year-end. Prediction markets on Kalshi priced the September hike at 81% going into the decision; CME fed funds futures implied a 64% probability. The gap reinforces a recurring pattern in 2026: prediction markets have consistently assigned higher probabilities to rate hikes than CME futures, and have been correct.
The Federal Open Market Committee voted 12-0 on September 16 to raise the federal funds rate target by 25 basis points to 3.75%-4.00%, the first rate increase since the Fed's 2023 tightening cycle ended. Fed Chair Kevin Warsh, delivering the post-meeting press conference, said inflation 'remains elevated' and attributed persistent price pressures in part to high energy costs. The updated Summary of Economic Projections — the dot plot — showed that 16 of 18 FOMC participants expected at least one additional hike at either the November or December 2026 meetings, with four officials projecting two more increases before year-end. Markets priced further tightening immediately: two-year Treasury yields rose sharply, the dollar strengthened, and both equity and credit markets fell on the more hawkish-than-anticipated dot plot.
Kalshi's prediction market on the September FOMC outcome had priced the 25bp hike at 81% going into the meeting. CME Group's FedWatch tool, derived from fed funds futures pricing, implied a 64% probability of the same outcome at the same time. The 17-percentage-point gap is not unique to this meeting: Kalshi has consistently priced higher probabilities of rate hikes than CME futures throughout 2026. In July, when CME implied roughly 26% probability of a September hike, Kalshi showed approximately 47%. By September 14, the day before the decision, Kalshi was at 81% and CME at 64%. The gap narrowed over time as the decision approached, but Kalshi maintained a persistently higher hike probability throughout the forecasting window — and proved more accurate. Academic research on prediction markets versus futures-implied probabilities has generally found that prediction markets aggregate information differently and can lead futures pricing on rate decisions by days or weeks.
The mechanics behind the divergence are debated. One explanation is that CME fed funds futures are used extensively for hedging, which introduces a risk premium that biases the implied probability away from pure expectation — a trader who wants to hedge against a hike will buy contracts that increase in value if rates rise, pushing the futures price toward pricing a higher rate probability even if the trader does not personally believe a hike is more likely than not. Prediction markets, by contrast, are closer to pure probability contracts with no physical delivery or hedging demand, which means the price should more directly reflect participants' collective probability estimate. Whether the Kalshi market's structural cleanliness or its participant base's informational advantage drove the September gap is not determinable from the price alone, but the outcome validates the higher Kalshi probability over the CME futures signal on this particular call.
The Fed hike's broader implications are relevant to prediction markets beyond the forecasting validation. Higher rates increase the cost of capital for early-stage companies, which matters for Kalshi and Polymarket US as private companies with ongoing fundraising needs and expansion plans. A second hike before year-end — which the dot plot suggests is likely — would further tighten financial conditions. On the other hand, a higher-rate environment historically generates more trading interest in rate-sensitive financial products, and Kalshi's economic and Fed-decision markets have been among its highest-volume non-sports categories. The next FOMC meeting is scheduled for October 28-29, 2026, which falls during the NFL regular season's peak and one week before the November 3 congressional midterm elections — a date that will concentrate prediction market volume in Fed, political, and sports categories simultaneously.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi's Parlays Drive Back-to-Back $5B Days — and Hand Critics Their Strongest Argument
Kalshi traded a record $5.33 billion on November 7 and $5.36 billion on November 8, with multi-leg parlay-style 'combos' making up roughly 75% of both days' volume. Its 30-day volume topped $100 billion. But the parlay dominance cuts against the platform's legal defense: parlays are a quintessential sportsbook product, and the American Gaming Association has told the Second Circuit that parlays make up about two-thirds of Kalshi's volume and should be treated as sports bets. The implied house edge on 10-plus-leg combos is around 25%, undercutting the argument that these are neutral financial instruments rather than gambling.
Cruz Bill Would Require State or Tribal Approval for Sports Contracts — a Bipartisan Legislative Threat Emerges
Senator Ted Cruz, who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, is preparing a bill that would bar federally regulated prediction markets from offering gambling-tied event contracts, including sports, unless a state or tribal government authorizes them. It would not ban the contracts nationwide but would require platforms to obtain approval jurisdiction by jurisdiction, resembling state-by-state sportsbook regulation. The proposal arrives as Democrats take control of both chambers after the midterms, creating a potential bipartisan reckoning: a Republican committee chair and a newly skeptical Democratic majority both eyeing restrictions on a sector that had relied on federal protection.
CFTC Tells Platforms to Stop Geofencing States — Directly Colliding With State Court Orders
The CFTC issued an interpretation on November 5 of its 'impartial access' core principle, telling regulated exchanges including Kalshi and Polymarket to drop state-by-state geographic blocks within 30 days or explain why they cannot. The demand collides head-on with existing state court orders that require the platforms to geofence: Washington ordered Kalshi to geofence in August, and Michigan ordered it to use licensed geolocation to block the state in September, with a $500,000 daily fine for violations. Chairman Michael Selig framed the interpretation as a uniformity requirement. The platforms are now caught between a federal demand to unblock states and state court orders to block them.