Oregon Senators Ask CFTC to Ban Wildfire Betting — Citing Arson Risk and the $1.2 Million Wagered on the LA Fires
A coalition led by Oregon's senators has formally urged CFTC Chair Michael Selig to prohibit prediction market platforms from offering contracts on active wildfires. The demand follows reports that Polymarket accepted more than $1.2 million in wagers on the January 2025 Palisades and Eaton fires, which killed 31 people and destroyed more than 16,000 structures. Fire officials warn that financial stakes on wildfires create a direct incentive for arson. The CFTC has been asked to respond by August 14.
A public coalition that includes Oregon's senators has sent a formal letter to CFTC Chair Michael Selig demanding that the commission prohibit designated contract markets from offering event contracts on active wildfires. The demand was triggered by CNN reporting that Polymarket, the world's largest prediction market platform by volume, accepted more than $1.2 million in wagers on the Palisades and Eaton fires — the January 2025 Los Angeles wildfires that killed 31 people and destroyed more than 16,000 structures. 'Offering bets on destructive wildfires threatens to minimize communities' suffering all so the rich and powerful can profit,' the senators wrote. 'There's also the heightened risk — according to state and local fire officials — that individuals could be tempted to commit arson in order to make sure their bets are successful. By offering contracts on fires, prediction market sites run the risk of encouraging people to influence fires that have already started, creating additional concerns around public safety and insider trading.' The CFTC has been asked to respond to four specific questions by August 14.
The letter also targets a newly launched platform — not Kalshi or Polymarket — that allows users to place simulated bets on California wildfires under the slogan 'You can't predict fire, but you can trade on it.' The emergence of disaster-specific platforms signals that the CFTC's decision on wildfire contracts will set a precedent not just for the established licensed exchanges but for an expanding fringe of operators explicitly building products around catastrophic events. The senators are asking the commission to address both domestic designated contract markets and offshore platforms, which fall outside CFTC direct jurisdiction but remain accessible to US users.
The arson argument is the most structurally distinctive objection in a summer of prediction market integrity debates. Clinical trial researchers have warned that pharmacists and coordinators with trial access could tamper with results for a payout — a concern that requires specific medical access and expertise. Wildfire arson requires no specialized knowledge. A person with a bet on a wildfire burning more than a specified number of acres faces a much lower barrier to influencing their position than any financial market participant. Fire officials have raised this specific concern rather than legislators alone — the warning about influencing containment of ongoing fires adds a second mechanism: a bettor positioned on a fire growing could obstruct suppression efforts, report false conditions, or interfere with evacuation coordination in areas where they have access. Whether any of these risks materialize in practice is unknown, but the CFTC's four-question deadline suggests the senators are pressing for a regulatory commitment before the 2026 fire season produces the conditions in which the risk would become concrete.
The timing intersects with the CFTC's broader rulemaking process at a critical moment. The commission's proposed NPRM, published in the Federal Register on June 12 and covering 267 pages, would permit most sports event contracts while banning specific categories including single-play, injury, officiating, and pre-collegiate markets. The proposed rule did not address wildfire or natural disaster contracts explicitly — a gap the senators' letter is now pressing the commission to fill. The CFTC comment window closed July 27. The August 14 deadline for the commission's response on wildfire betting arrives as the commission is processing thousands of comments on the NPRM and navigating eleven simultaneous state-level litigation cases. It is the second high-profile ethical challenge to land on the commission's desk in as many weeks — the clinical trial betting controversy reported by NPR on August 7 is the other — and both arrive at a moment when the commission is under active congressional scrutiny following the House Agriculture Committee hearing on July 22. Chair Selig has called the state enforcement actions an 'onslaught' and a 'power grab,' but the wildfire and clinical trial controversies represent a different kind of pressure: not from states asserting jurisdiction, but from the public questioning whether certain prediction market categories should exist at all.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi's Parlays Drive Back-to-Back $5B Days — and Hand Critics Their Strongest Argument
Kalshi traded a record $5.33 billion on November 7 and $5.36 billion on November 8, with multi-leg parlay-style 'combos' making up roughly 75% of both days' volume. Its 30-day volume topped $100 billion. But the parlay dominance cuts against the platform's legal defense: parlays are a quintessential sportsbook product, and the American Gaming Association has told the Second Circuit that parlays make up about two-thirds of Kalshi's volume and should be treated as sports bets. The implied house edge on 10-plus-leg combos is around 25%, undercutting the argument that these are neutral financial instruments rather than gambling.
Cruz Bill Would Require State or Tribal Approval for Sports Contracts — a Bipartisan Legislative Threat Emerges
Senator Ted Cruz, who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, is preparing a bill that would bar federally regulated prediction markets from offering gambling-tied event contracts, including sports, unless a state or tribal government authorizes them. It would not ban the contracts nationwide but would require platforms to obtain approval jurisdiction by jurisdiction, resembling state-by-state sportsbook regulation. The proposal arrives as Democrats take control of both chambers after the midterms, creating a potential bipartisan reckoning: a Republican committee chair and a newly skeptical Democratic majority both eyeing restrictions on a sector that had relied on federal protection.
CFTC Tells Platforms to Stop Geofencing States — Directly Colliding With State Court Orders
The CFTC issued an interpretation on November 5 of its 'impartial access' core principle, telling regulated exchanges including Kalshi and Polymarket to drop state-by-state geographic blocks within 30 days or explain why they cannot. The demand collides head-on with existing state court orders that require the platforms to geofence: Washington ordered Kalshi to geofence in August, and Michigan ordered it to use licensed geolocation to block the state in September, with a $500,000 daily fine for violations. Chairman Michael Selig framed the interpretation as a uniformity requirement. The platforms are now caught between a federal demand to unblock states and state court orders to block them.