Washington State Becomes the 11th: Judge Rules Kalshi Likely Ran an Illegal Gambling Operation
King County Superior Court Judge John McHale granted Washington state a preliminary injunction against Kalshi on July 21, ruling the prediction market platform likely operated an illegal gambling operation under state law. McHale rejected Kalshi's CFTC-preemption defense. He asked both sides to present a compliance plan by the first week of August. Washington is the 11th state to take legal action — and the fourth where a court has ruled against Kalshi, after Michigan, Nevada, and New York.
King County Superior Court Judge John McHale granted Washington state a preliminary injunction against Kalshi on July 21, 2026, ruling that the prediction market platform likely ran an illegal gambling operation under Washington state law. McHale rejected Kalshi's argument that its status as a CFTC-designated contract market preempts state gambling enforcement — the same federal-preemption theory that succeeded in Arizona in May but has now failed in Michigan, Nevada, New York, and Washington. The ruling was requested by Washington's Attorney General after the Washington State Gambling Commission sent Kalshi a notice stating that offering event-based contracts was not authorized in the state — a notice Kalshi had, per court filings, ignored. McHale asked both sides to confer and present a compliance plan by the first week of August.
Washington is the 11th state to take active legal action against prediction market platforms and the fourth where a court ruling has gone against Kalshi. The pattern is now impossible to miss: every state-level court that has directly ruled on the CFTC-preemption question — Michigan's Judge Maloney in June, Nevada's First Judicial District in May, New York's Judge Torres in July, and now Washington's Judge McHale — has rejected the preemption argument and allowed state gambling enforcement to proceed. The lone exception remains Arizona, where a federal court granted the CFTC a preliminary injunction in May. The split between state and federal court outcomes reflects the underlying jurisdictional uncertainty: state courts applying state gambling law have consistently concluded that a CFTC license does not operate as a general exemption from state gambling rules, while the CFTC's own federal preemption theory prevailed only where the agency was the direct plaintiff.
McHale's specific framing — that Kalshi 'likely ran an illegal gambling operation' — is notable. Unlike the Michigan ruling, which turned primarily on whether event contracts are swaps under the Commodity Exchange Act, McHale appears to have reached the state-gambling-law conclusion directly, without extensive engagement with the swap definition question. That is a simpler analytical path that other state courts could follow: rather than engaging with federal derivatives law, a judge can hold that the activity is gambling under state definitions and that no federal license automatically exempts it. If that reasoning becomes the template, the litigation burden shifts significantly toward platforms, which would need to defeat a state-law gambling characterization in each of the states where cases are pending.
Washington joins a litigation map that now spans four time zones and four federal circuits. The practical effect for Kalshi users in Washington State remains unclear: McHale asked the parties to negotiate the specific terms of the injunction rather than imposing immediate access restrictions, meaning the enforcement mechanism is still being worked out. But the ruling adds legal pressure ahead of two hard deadlines: the Michigan geofencing deadline of August 12 (with a $500,000-per-day fine for non-compliance) and the Minnesota felony ban's August 1 effective date — unless Judge Menendez in Minnesota issues the platforms a preliminary injunction before then.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi Suspends Congressional Candidate for Trading on Own Race — Senate Already Banned Members
Kalshi disclosed on August 31 that it suspended North Carolina congressional candidate Laurie Buckhout for three years and fined her $2,589 for trading on her own race — the first publicly known enforcement action against a candidate for prediction market insider trading. Kalshi said it found multiple politicians trading on races they were involved in, including former Congressman George Santos. The Senate had unanimously banned its members and staffers from prediction market trading on April 30. CNN published a major feature on September 24 documenting election officials' concerns about disinformation and insider trading risk from prediction markets as the midterms approach.
Pew Research: Prediction Market Volume Doubled May-July, Sports Now Largest Category
A Pew Research Center analysis published September 23 found that combined monthly trading volume on Kalshi and Polymarket more than doubled from May to July 2026 — rising from $26 billion in May to $53 billion in July — driven primarily by sports contracts. Sports is now the largest trading category on both platforms. During the FIFA World Cup in June and July, Kalshi's monthly sports volume reached $58 billion. Over the same period, Americans wagered roughly $40 billion at licensed sportsbooks — suggesting prediction market sports volume has approached or exceeded licensed sports betting in dollar terms.
Democrats Now 60% Senate, 90% House Favorites on Prediction Markets — Biggest Shift Since 2024
Prediction markets on Kalshi and Polymarket have moved decisively toward Democratic control of both congressional chambers in the 2026 midterms. Democrats are priced at approximately 60% to win Senate control (Republicans 40%) and roughly 90% to win House control as of September 21. Republicans had been at 80%+ in Senate control markets when the market opened in November 2024. The shift began in February 2026 following the Iran war and has accelerated through fall as rising gas prices pushed Trump's approval ratings lower. More than 500 active midterm markets are live across Kalshi and Polymarket combined.