House Oversight Opens Formal Insider-Trading Probe Into Kalshi and Polymarket
Chairman James Comer sent document-demand letters to the CEOs of Kalshi and Polymarket on May 22, with a June 5 deadline, and signaled forthcoming legislation that would bar members of Congress, administration officials, and federal employees from trading prediction-market contracts.
House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman James Comer (R-KY) announced on CNBC's Squawk Box on May 22, 2026 that he has sent formal document-demand letters to Kalshi CEO Tarek Mansour and Polymarket CEO Shayne Coplan. The letters request internal records on how each platform verifies the identities of domestic and foreign account holders, enforces geographic restrictions, and monitors trading for patterns consistent with insider information. Both CEOs were given until June 5 to respond. Comer framed the inquiry directly in his statement: "There's a concern now that members of Congress, members of the president's administration, any type of government employee, can use basic insider knowledge and make huge profits on anything government-related."
The probe rests on two pieces of public evidence the committee has cited explicitly. A recent New York Times investigation identified more than 80 Polymarket wallets that placed trades with timing patterns consistent with advance knowledge of major news events, including positions opened hours before US and Israeli strikes in Iran. Separately, the April 2026 arrest of US Army Master Sergeant Gannon Ken Van Dyke for trading roughly $400,000 in profits on Polymarket markets related to the Maduro operation gave the committee a documented criminal case to anchor the investigation. Comer told NOTUS that the current state of the market is "the Wild West."
Comer indicated that the probe is the first step toward legislation that would explicitly bar federal officials from trading event contracts. The proposed framework would parallel existing rules under the STOCK Act for individual securities, but applied to prediction-market contracts, which are currently treated as commodity derivatives and fall outside most government ethics disclosure regimes. New York Governor Kathy Hochul and Illinois Governor JB Pritzker issued state-level executive orders covering the same conduct in late April 2026; a federal statute would close the gap for the executive branch, legislative branch, and the federal contractor workforce, none of which are reached by state orders.
For Kalshi and Polymarket, the immediate question is whether the document production satisfies the committee or escalates to public hearings. Polymarket already cooperated extensively with the Department of Justice in the Van Dyke prosecution, and Kalshi has publicly highlighted its own compliance investments. Both companies have an incentive to produce thorough records on June 5; a perceived stonewall would hand Comer the political momentum to move legislation faster than the industry would like. The deeper risk is the legislation itself: a federal trading ban for government employees would not, on its own, materially shrink platform volume, but it would create a category of forbidden user that platforms have to actively police, exposing them to enforcement actions whenever the policing fails. That is a meaningful new compliance cost layered on top of the existing state-level patchwork.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi's Parlays Drive Back-to-Back $5B Days — and Hand Critics Their Strongest Argument
Kalshi traded a record $5.33 billion on November 7 and $5.36 billion on November 8, with multi-leg parlay-style 'combos' making up roughly 75% of both days' volume. Its 30-day volume topped $100 billion. But the parlay dominance cuts against the platform's legal defense: parlays are a quintessential sportsbook product, and the American Gaming Association has told the Second Circuit that parlays make up about two-thirds of Kalshi's volume and should be treated as sports bets. The implied house edge on 10-plus-leg combos is around 25%, undercutting the argument that these are neutral financial instruments rather than gambling.
Cruz Bill Would Require State or Tribal Approval for Sports Contracts — a Bipartisan Legislative Threat Emerges
Senator Ted Cruz, who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, is preparing a bill that would bar federally regulated prediction markets from offering gambling-tied event contracts, including sports, unless a state or tribal government authorizes them. It would not ban the contracts nationwide but would require platforms to obtain approval jurisdiction by jurisdiction, resembling state-by-state sportsbook regulation. The proposal arrives as Democrats take control of both chambers after the midterms, creating a potential bipartisan reckoning: a Republican committee chair and a newly skeptical Democratic majority both eyeing restrictions on a sector that had relied on federal protection.
CFTC Tells Platforms to Stop Geofencing States — Directly Colliding With State Court Orders
The CFTC issued an interpretation on November 5 of its 'impartial access' core principle, telling regulated exchanges including Kalshi and Polymarket to drop state-by-state geographic blocks within 30 days or explain why they cannot. The demand collides head-on with existing state court orders that require the platforms to geofence: Washington ordered Kalshi to geofence in August, and Michigan ordered it to use licensed geolocation to block the state in September, with a $500,000 daily fine for violations. Chairman Michael Selig framed the interpretation as a uniformity requirement. The platforms are now caught between a federal demand to unblock states and state court orders to block them.