India Blocks Polymarket Under New Online Gaming Act; Kalshi Order Reportedly Imminent
India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology has ordered ISPs to cut access to Polymarket, classifying event contracts as "online money gaming" under the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act 2025. A similar order targeting Kalshi is reportedly being prepared.
India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology (MeitY) has issued a blocking order directing Indian internet service providers to cut access to Polymarket, and local media reports cite an anonymous MeitY source saying a parallel order for Kalshi could be issued as soon as this Friday. Polymarket is currently inaccessible to Indian users; Kalshi remains reachable as of publication. The action is the first major sovereign blocking of CFTC-regulated event-contract platforms outside the United States and represents a substantively different regulatory model from the state-level felony statute Minnesota signed earlier this week.
India's legal hook is the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act 2025, which carves the online-gaming space into three categories: e-sports, social gaming, and "online money gaming." The last category is prohibited entirely, and MeitY has classified prediction-market activity as falling squarely inside it. The blocking order appears to flow from an April 25, 2026 MeitY advisory to VPN providers and consumer-internet platforms warning against facilitating access to prohibited gaming services. The Act's text gives MeitY broad executive authority to direct ISP-level blocks without requiring case-by-case judicial review, which is why the Polymarket block could be imposed quickly and why the Kalshi order can follow on a comparable timeline.
The Indian regulatory posture is not isolated. India already applies a 30% capital-gains rate on crypto-asset disposals and a 1% TDS (tax deducted at source) on every crypto transaction, an effective shadow-ban that has hollowed out domestic crypto trading volume since 2022. The same regulatory instinct (strict capital controls plus restrictive interpretation of digital-asset and gaming statutes) drives the prediction-market block. From Polymarket's perspective the loss is meaningful: India was one of the platform's fastest-growing international markets through 2025, and the QCEX-licensed US relaunch was supposed to compensate for any future international constraint, not for a constraint imposed at exactly the same time as the US ramp-up.
Neither Polymarket nor Kalshi has issued a public statement on the India action. Both companies have legal counsel reviewing whether the blocking order can be challenged in Indian court on administrative-law or constitutional grounds, but the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act 2025 is a recent, broadly written statute that the Indian government has shown willingness to enforce aggressively. The more realistic short-term path is engagement with MeitY on a possible exemption framework for CFTC-licensed exchanges, modeled on India's existing carve-outs for licensed brokerage of foreign securities. That path requires the platforms to argue that event contracts are commodity derivatives (a financial instrument) rather than gambling, which is the same argument they are making against US state attorneys general but with the burden of proof reversed under Indian administrative law.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi's Parlays Drive Back-to-Back $5B Days — and Hand Critics Their Strongest Argument
Kalshi traded a record $5.33 billion on November 7 and $5.36 billion on November 8, with multi-leg parlay-style 'combos' making up roughly 75% of both days' volume. Its 30-day volume topped $100 billion. But the parlay dominance cuts against the platform's legal defense: parlays are a quintessential sportsbook product, and the American Gaming Association has told the Second Circuit that parlays make up about two-thirds of Kalshi's volume and should be treated as sports bets. The implied house edge on 10-plus-leg combos is around 25%, undercutting the argument that these are neutral financial instruments rather than gambling.
Cruz Bill Would Require State or Tribal Approval for Sports Contracts — a Bipartisan Legislative Threat Emerges
Senator Ted Cruz, who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, is preparing a bill that would bar federally regulated prediction markets from offering gambling-tied event contracts, including sports, unless a state or tribal government authorizes them. It would not ban the contracts nationwide but would require platforms to obtain approval jurisdiction by jurisdiction, resembling state-by-state sportsbook regulation. The proposal arrives as Democrats take control of both chambers after the midterms, creating a potential bipartisan reckoning: a Republican committee chair and a newly skeptical Democratic majority both eyeing restrictions on a sector that had relied on federal protection.
CFTC Tells Platforms to Stop Geofencing States — Directly Colliding With State Court Orders
The CFTC issued an interpretation on November 5 of its 'impartial access' core principle, telling regulated exchanges including Kalshi and Polymarket to drop state-by-state geographic blocks within 30 days or explain why they cannot. The demand collides head-on with existing state court orders that require the platforms to geofence: Washington ordered Kalshi to geofence in August, and Michigan ordered it to use licensed geolocation to block the state in September, with a $500,000 daily fine for violations. Chairman Michael Selig framed the interpretation as a uniformity requirement. The platforms are now caught between a federal demand to unblock states and state court orders to block them.