Italy Re-Bans Polymarket — Putting a $22M Lazio FC Sponsorship Deal Under Italian Criminal Law
Italy's Customs and Monopolies Agency (ADM) added Polymarket to its blacklist of blocked websites for the second time in July 2026, re-classifying it as an unlicensed gambling operator. Polymarket had won a court reversal before the TAR Lazio administrative court in late 2025. The renewed block threatens Polymarket's $22 million sponsorship deal with Lazio FC: Italian law prohibits clubs from advertising unlicensed betting operations, potentially forcing Lazio to drop the partnership.
Italy's Customs and Monopolies Agency (ADM) added Polymarket to its official list of blocked websites for the second time in July 2026, once again classifying the prediction market as an unlicensed gambling operator. The block requires Italian internet service providers to prevent residents from accessing Polymarket.com. Polymarket was first blocked by Italy in late 2025 on the same grounds, but secured a reversal before the TAR Lazio — the Regional Administrative Court of Lazio — in proceedings that allowed the site to resume Italian access in December 2025. The ADM has now re-listed the domain, effectively restarting the blocking dispute despite the earlier court outcome.
The renewed ban has immediate implications beyond platform access. Polymarket holds a $22 million sponsorship deal with S.S. Lazio, the Serie A football club based in Rome. The sponsorship gives Polymarket prominent branding at the Stadio Olimpico and across Lazio's matchday and digital assets. Under Italian law, a club cannot lawfully advertise or endorse an entity that Italian authorities classify as an unlicensed betting operation — the prohibition is enforced under the penal code, not just regulatory guidance. If the ADM's re-listing stands, Lazio faces legal exposure for continuing to display Polymarket branding, and the club may be compelled to either renegotiate the deal or terminate it outright. Polymarket has not publicly commented on the status of the Lazio partnership following the re-blocking.
The episode illustrates how prediction markets sit in a genuinely different legal position across jurisdictions depending entirely on how a regulator classifies them. Polymarket maintains that its products are financial instruments, not gambling — the same argument it uses in its US litigation. In the United States, that argument is heard in federal court with the CFTC as advocate. In Italy, the ADM has no equivalent of the CFTC's preemption doctrine, and the classification decision belongs to the gambling regulator, which has now made it twice. The TAR Lazio ruling from late 2025 did not definitively resolve the classification question; it temporarily suspended the block, and the ADM re-exercised its authority on what appear to be the same underlying grounds.
The Italian ban lands on the same day Gibraltar announced the world's first dedicated prediction markets regulatory framework — a deliberate separate licensing category that explicitly distinguishes prediction markets from gambling. The contrast is sharp: one jurisdiction in Europe is building the legal infrastructure to license and regulate prediction markets as a distinct product, while another is re-blocking the sector's most prominent international platform for the second time in six months. For Polymarket, the more urgent question is whether the Lazio deal survives. For the industry, the Italian episode is a preview of what happens when prediction markets try to operate under a legal theory of 'not gambling' in a jurisdiction whose regulator has already decided they are.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi's Parlays Drive Back-to-Back $5B Days — and Hand Critics Their Strongest Argument
Kalshi traded a record $5.33 billion on November 7 and $5.36 billion on November 8, with multi-leg parlay-style 'combos' making up roughly 75% of both days' volume. Its 30-day volume topped $100 billion. But the parlay dominance cuts against the platform's legal defense: parlays are a quintessential sportsbook product, and the American Gaming Association has told the Second Circuit that parlays make up about two-thirds of Kalshi's volume and should be treated as sports bets. The implied house edge on 10-plus-leg combos is around 25%, undercutting the argument that these are neutral financial instruments rather than gambling.
Cruz Bill Would Require State or Tribal Approval for Sports Contracts — a Bipartisan Legislative Threat Emerges
Senator Ted Cruz, who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, is preparing a bill that would bar federally regulated prediction markets from offering gambling-tied event contracts, including sports, unless a state or tribal government authorizes them. It would not ban the contracts nationwide but would require platforms to obtain approval jurisdiction by jurisdiction, resembling state-by-state sportsbook regulation. The proposal arrives as Democrats take control of both chambers after the midterms, creating a potential bipartisan reckoning: a Republican committee chair and a newly skeptical Democratic majority both eyeing restrictions on a sector that had relied on federal protection.
CFTC Tells Platforms to Stop Geofencing States — Directly Colliding With State Court Orders
The CFTC issued an interpretation on November 5 of its 'impartial access' core principle, telling regulated exchanges including Kalshi and Polymarket to drop state-by-state geographic blocks within 30 days or explain why they cannot. The demand collides head-on with existing state court orders that require the platforms to geofence: Washington ordered Kalshi to geofence in August, and Michigan ordered it to use licensed geolocation to block the state in September, with a $500,000 daily fine for violations. Chairman Michael Selig framed the interpretation as a uniformity requirement. The platforms are now caught between a federal demand to unblock states and state court orders to block them.