Kalshi Loses New York Ruling: Federal License Does Not Override State Gambling Law
US District Judge Analisa Torres of the Southern District of New York denied Kalshi's motion for a preliminary injunction on July 7, ruling that the Commodity Exchange Act does not preempt New York's gambling enforcement. The decision — Kalshi's own suit, not the CFTC's — hands state regulators another win and opens a second federal circuit on prediction market law. Kalshi appealed to the Second Circuit the same day.
US District Judge Analisa Torres of the Southern District of New York denied Kalshi's motion for a preliminary injunction on July 7, 2026, in KalshiEX LLC v. Williams — Kalshi's own suit against New York officials, filed in October 2025 after the state sent a cease-and-desist letter alleging it was offering sports gambling without a New York license. Torres ruled that the Commodity Exchange Act does not preempt New York's gambling enforcement under either field preemption or conflict preemption theory. Kalshi filed notice of appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit the same day.
The ruling adds a third datapoint against the platforms' central legal argument. In Arizona, the CFTC won a preliminary injunction on May 5 based on three distinct preemption theories: field preemption, conflict preemption, and impossibility. Torres rejected all three in New York. She held that the CEA does not occupy the entire regulatory field for event contracts to the exclusion of state law. She rejected conflict preemption on the grounds that Kalshi can simultaneously comply with its CFTC obligations and New York's gambling law — by either obtaining a state gambling license or limiting which contracts it offers to New York residents. And impossibility preemption failed for the same reason: compliance with both regimes is possible, just commercially inconvenient. The CFTC filed its own separate suit against New York in May 2026, which remains pending in a parallel docket.
New York is the largest legal sports-betting market in the United States, generating roughly $2.3 billion in annual handle through the licensed online system overseen by the New York State Gaming Commission. That context shapes how state regulators view an unlicensed federal exchange offering the same sports-outcome contracts: not as a different product, but as unlicensed competition for the same dollar. The Torres ruling means the New York Gaming Commission can now proceed with enforcement against Kalshi and other prediction market platforms without a federal injunction blocking it.
Prediction-market preemption is now active in three federal appellate jurisdictions simultaneously. The Sixth Circuit has the Michigan case, where Polymarket and Robinhood's preliminary injunction was denied in June. The Ninth Circuit has the Arizona case, where the CFTC won its injunction in May and an appeal from Arizona is expected. And now the Second Circuit has the New York case, where Kalshi's own injunction was denied July 7. The three-circuit split makes a Supreme Court resolution increasingly likely. The question is whether any circuit moves fast enough to settle the question before the August 1 Minnesota felony ban goes live or before Congress passes a federal prediction-market bill that would resolve the jurisdiction question by statute.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi Suspends Congressional Candidate for Trading on Own Race — Senate Already Banned Members
Kalshi disclosed on August 31 that it suspended North Carolina congressional candidate Laurie Buckhout for three years and fined her $2,589 for trading on her own race — the first publicly known enforcement action against a candidate for prediction market insider trading. Kalshi said it found multiple politicians trading on races they were involved in, including former Congressman George Santos. The Senate had unanimously banned its members and staffers from prediction market trading on April 30. CNN published a major feature on September 24 documenting election officials' concerns about disinformation and insider trading risk from prediction markets as the midterms approach.
Pew Research: Prediction Market Volume Doubled May-July, Sports Now Largest Category
A Pew Research Center analysis published September 23 found that combined monthly trading volume on Kalshi and Polymarket more than doubled from May to July 2026 — rising from $26 billion in May to $53 billion in July — driven primarily by sports contracts. Sports is now the largest trading category on both platforms. During the FIFA World Cup in June and July, Kalshi's monthly sports volume reached $58 billion. Over the same period, Americans wagered roughly $40 billion at licensed sportsbooks — suggesting prediction market sports volume has approached or exceeded licensed sports betting in dollar terms.
Democrats Now 60% Senate, 90% House Favorites on Prediction Markets — Biggest Shift Since 2024
Prediction markets on Kalshi and Polymarket have moved decisively toward Democratic control of both congressional chambers in the 2026 midterms. Democrats are priced at approximately 60% to win Senate control (Republicans 40%) and roughly 90% to win House control as of September 21. Republicans had been at 80%+ in Senate control markets when the market opened in November 2024. The shift began in February 2026 following the Iran war and has accelerated through fall as rising gas prices pushed Trump's approval ratings lower. More than 500 active midterm markets are live across Kalshi and Polymarket combined.