Kalshi Loses New York Ruling: Federal License Does Not Override State Gambling Law
US District Judge Analisa Torres of the Southern District of New York denied Kalshi's motion for a preliminary injunction on July 7, ruling that the Commodity Exchange Act does not preempt New York's gambling enforcement. The decision — Kalshi's own suit, not the CFTC's — hands state regulators another win and opens a second federal circuit on prediction market law. Kalshi appealed to the Second Circuit the same day.
US District Judge Analisa Torres of the Southern District of New York denied Kalshi's motion for a preliminary injunction on July 7, 2026, in KalshiEX LLC v. Williams — Kalshi's own suit against New York officials, filed in October 2025 after the state sent a cease-and-desist letter alleging it was offering sports gambling without a New York license. Torres ruled that the Commodity Exchange Act does not preempt New York's gambling enforcement under either field preemption or conflict preemption theory. Kalshi filed notice of appeal to the US Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit the same day.
The ruling adds a third datapoint against the platforms' central legal argument. In Arizona, the CFTC won a preliminary injunction on May 5 based on three distinct preemption theories: field preemption, conflict preemption, and impossibility. Torres rejected all three in New York. She held that the CEA does not occupy the entire regulatory field for event contracts to the exclusion of state law. She rejected conflict preemption on the grounds that Kalshi can simultaneously comply with its CFTC obligations and New York's gambling law — by either obtaining a state gambling license or limiting which contracts it offers to New York residents. And impossibility preemption failed for the same reason: compliance with both regimes is possible, just commercially inconvenient. The CFTC filed its own separate suit against New York in May 2026, which remains pending in a parallel docket.
New York is the largest legal sports-betting market in the United States, generating roughly $2.3 billion in annual handle through the licensed online system overseen by the New York State Gaming Commission. That context shapes how state regulators view an unlicensed federal exchange offering the same sports-outcome contracts: not as a different product, but as unlicensed competition for the same dollar. The Torres ruling means the New York Gaming Commission can now proceed with enforcement against Kalshi and other prediction market platforms without a federal injunction blocking it.
Prediction-market preemption is now active in three federal appellate jurisdictions simultaneously. The Sixth Circuit has the Michigan case, where Polymarket and Robinhood's preliminary injunction was denied in June. The Ninth Circuit has the Arizona case, where the CFTC won its injunction in May and an appeal from Arizona is expected. And now the Second Circuit has the New York case, where Kalshi's own injunction was denied July 7. The three-circuit split makes a Supreme Court resolution increasingly likely. The question is whether any circuit moves fast enough to settle the question before the August 1 Minnesota felony ban goes live or before Congress passes a federal prediction-market bill that would resolve the jurisdiction question by statute.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi's Parlays Drive Back-to-Back $5B Days — and Hand Critics Their Strongest Argument
Kalshi traded a record $5.33 billion on November 7 and $5.36 billion on November 8, with multi-leg parlay-style 'combos' making up roughly 75% of both days' volume. Its 30-day volume topped $100 billion. But the parlay dominance cuts against the platform's legal defense: parlays are a quintessential sportsbook product, and the American Gaming Association has told the Second Circuit that parlays make up about two-thirds of Kalshi's volume and should be treated as sports bets. The implied house edge on 10-plus-leg combos is around 25%, undercutting the argument that these are neutral financial instruments rather than gambling.
Cruz Bill Would Require State or Tribal Approval for Sports Contracts — a Bipartisan Legislative Threat Emerges
Senator Ted Cruz, who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, is preparing a bill that would bar federally regulated prediction markets from offering gambling-tied event contracts, including sports, unless a state or tribal government authorizes them. It would not ban the contracts nationwide but would require platforms to obtain approval jurisdiction by jurisdiction, resembling state-by-state sportsbook regulation. The proposal arrives as Democrats take control of both chambers after the midterms, creating a potential bipartisan reckoning: a Republican committee chair and a newly skeptical Democratic majority both eyeing restrictions on a sector that had relied on federal protection.
CFTC Tells Platforms to Stop Geofencing States — Directly Colliding With State Court Orders
The CFTC issued an interpretation on November 5 of its 'impartial access' core principle, telling regulated exchanges including Kalshi and Polymarket to drop state-by-state geographic blocks within 30 days or explain why they cannot. The demand collides head-on with existing state court orders that require the platforms to geofence: Washington ordered Kalshi to geofence in August, and Michigan ordered it to use licensed geolocation to block the state in September, with a $500,000 daily fine for violations. Chairman Michael Selig framed the interpretation as a uniformity requirement. The platforms are now caught between a federal demand to unblock states and state court orders to block them.