Michigan Judge Rules Sports Contracts Likely Aren't Swaps — the First Real Crack in the CFTC Preemption Wall
US District Judge Paul Maloney denied Polymarket and Robinhood a preliminary injunction on June 19, 2026, ruling that sports event contracts are likely not swaps under the Commodity Exchange Act and that CFTC authority would 'sweep in activity that has traditionally belonged to state regulators.' It is the first significant court loss for the prediction-market side and turns the scattered district-court rulings into a Sixth Circuit split.
US District Judge Paul L. Maloney of the Western District of Michigan denied Polymarket and Robinhood a preliminary injunction on June 19, 2026, ruling that sports event contracts are likely not swaps under the Commodity Exchange Act and therefore likely fall outside the CFTC's exclusive jurisdiction. The platforms had sought the injunction to block Michigan regulators — after Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel sued Kalshi alleging illegal online sports betting — on the same federal-preemption theory that won in Arizona on May 5. Maloney rejected it. He wrote that the CFTC's broad authority claims "would sweep in activity that has traditionally belonged to state regulators rather than federal financial agencies," and reasoned that the lawmakers who drafted post-2008 financial-reform legislation did not intend to shift gambling-regulation power from states to a federal derivatives agency.
This is the first significant court loss for the prediction-market side in the 2026 wave, and it matters far beyond Michigan. Until now the story had one direction: the CFTC and the platforms won the Arizona preliminary injunction, and the agency cited that win as persuasive authority in every subsequent state case, framing its campaign as a clean sweep of black-letter preemption. Maloney's ruling ends the clean-sweep narrative. The district courts are now openly split — and the split runs inside a single appeals court. Michigan, Ohio, and Tennessee all sit in the Sixth Circuit, and the three have now gone three different ways: an Ohio judge sided with state regulators, a Tennessee judge backed the platforms, and Maloney has sided with the state. A federal appellate court cannot leave its own district courts contradicting each other on a question this consequential, which is why the Sixth Circuit is now expected to take the issue up directly.
The reasoning is what makes the ruling dangerous for the industry, not just the outcome. Maloney did not rule on a technicality; he engaged the core question — are these contracts swaps? — and answered no, at least at the likelihood-of-success stage. That is the exact opposite of Judge Liburdi's Arizona analysis, which found three independent grounds for preemption. Two federal judges looking at materially the same product reached opposite conclusions on the threshold legal question. That is the definition of an issue headed for higher review, and it strengthens the hand of every state attorney general — New Mexico's Raúl Torrez, Rhode Island's Peter Neronha, Minnesota's Keith Ellison — who has argued that the gambling characterization survives federal commodity law. It also gives the CFTC's still-pending proposed rule more weight, not less: the agency now has a concrete incentive to finalize a regulatory regime that makes the swaps characterization harder for a court to reject.
Two structural notes for readers tracking where this goes. First, an honest correction to our own prior coverage: we have repeatedly described the CFTC as winning these fights at the trial-court level and our litigation scoreboard showed zero state wins. Michigan changes that, and we have updated the scoreboard to reflect it. The accurate picture as of late June is a genuine split, not a federal sweep. Second, the tribal dimension is escalating in parallel: a coalition of more than 30 federally recognized tribes and the Indian Gaming Association filed an amicus brief supporting New York's position, arguing prediction markets threaten the exclusivity of tribal-state gaming compacts. That sovereignty interest — also live in the New Mexico case — adds a constituency that neither the platforms nor the CFTC can easily argue away, and it is the kind of argument appellate judges take seriously. The realistic path now runs through the Sixth Circuit and, almost certainly, eventually the Supreme Court.
Operators mentioned in this article
Kalshi
First fully CFTC-regulated US event-contract exchange.
Polymarket
USDC-settled on Polygon. Largest prediction market by volume.
Robinhood
Consumer brokerage offering embedded event contracts. Fastest-growing retail prediction market platform in the US.
Recent updates
Kalshi's Parlays Drive Back-to-Back $5B Days — and Hand Critics Their Strongest Argument
Kalshi traded a record $5.33 billion on November 7 and $5.36 billion on November 8, with multi-leg parlay-style 'combos' making up roughly 75% of both days' volume. Its 30-day volume topped $100 billion. But the parlay dominance cuts against the platform's legal defense: parlays are a quintessential sportsbook product, and the American Gaming Association has told the Second Circuit that parlays make up about two-thirds of Kalshi's volume and should be treated as sports bets. The implied house edge on 10-plus-leg combos is around 25%, undercutting the argument that these are neutral financial instruments rather than gambling.
Cruz Bill Would Require State or Tribal Approval for Sports Contracts — a Bipartisan Legislative Threat Emerges
Senator Ted Cruz, who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, is preparing a bill that would bar federally regulated prediction markets from offering gambling-tied event contracts, including sports, unless a state or tribal government authorizes them. It would not ban the contracts nationwide but would require platforms to obtain approval jurisdiction by jurisdiction, resembling state-by-state sportsbook regulation. The proposal arrives as Democrats take control of both chambers after the midterms, creating a potential bipartisan reckoning: a Republican committee chair and a newly skeptical Democratic majority both eyeing restrictions on a sector that had relied on federal protection.
CFTC Tells Platforms to Stop Geofencing States — Directly Colliding With State Court Orders
The CFTC issued an interpretation on November 5 of its 'impartial access' core principle, telling regulated exchanges including Kalshi and Polymarket to drop state-by-state geographic blocks within 30 days or explain why they cannot. The demand collides head-on with existing state court orders that require the platforms to geofence: Washington ordered Kalshi to geofence in August, and Michigan ordered it to use licensed geolocation to block the state in September, with a $500,000 daily fine for violations. Chairman Michael Selig framed the interpretation as a uniformity requirement. The platforms are now caught between a federal demand to unblock states and state court orders to block them.