Spain Initiates Disciplinary Proceedings Against Polymarket and Kalshi; Third Country to Block in 10 Days
Spain's gaming regulator ordered ISPs to block Polymarket and Kalshi access on May 26, 2026, opening formal disciplinary proceedings against both platforms for offering unlicensed betting products. Spain joins India and Indonesia in a coordinated 10-day wave of international blocking actions.
Spain's General Directorate for the Regulation of Gambling (DGOJ) initiated formal disciplinary proceedings against Polymarket and Kalshi on May 26, 2026 and ordered Spanish internet service providers to block access to both platforms. Spain classifies event-contract trading as unlicensed online betting under its 2011 Gaming Act, which requires a national license for any operator offering gambling products to Spanish residents. Neither Polymarket nor Kalshi holds the required license; Spanish regulators argue this makes both platforms criminal-law violators regardless of their US regulatory status.
Spain is the third country in ten days to take blocking action. India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology blocked Polymarket on May 22 under the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act 2025, and signaled that a Kalshi order would follow. Indonesia issued a parallel blocking order earlier in the same week. The three jurisdictions are unrelated in legal framework but converging on the same policy outcome: classify event contracts as gambling, deny exemption for foreign regulatory licenses, and use ISP-level blocking as the enforcement tool. None of the three offered the platforms a path to compliance through local licensing.
The international containment trajectory matters because Polymarket and Kalshi have been positioning themselves as globally accessible derivatives venues. Polymarket's international platform (the original, separate from the QCEX-licensed US product) drove most of the company's growth through 2025 and into 2026. India was the fastest-growing international market last year. Spain is smaller in absolute terms but symbolically significant as the first EU member state to formally block; the question is whether other EU regulators (BaFin in Germany, AMF in France, CySEC in Cyprus) follow the Spanish framework. None has formally moved yet. EU members generally coordinate on financial-services regulation through ESMA, but gambling regulation is explicitly carved out as a member-state competence, which is why Spain can act unilaterally without triggering EU-level proceedings.
For the platforms the operational response is constrained. ISP-level blocking can be circumvented through VPN use, and prior data from comparable jurisdictions suggests 60 to 80 percent of motivated users find workarounds within weeks. The deeper damage is to institutional credibility and to compliance frameworks the platforms need for US relaunch under QCEX. A CFTC-licensed exchange that is simultaneously being blocked as illegal gambling in three sovereign jurisdictions has a harder story to tell to US prudential regulators, to potential institutional investors, and (most importantly) to the federal courts now deciding the US state preemption cases. The international actions create a narrative that prediction-market platforms are operating in regulatory gray areas everywhere except where US federal law has unambiguously protected them, which is exactly the framing state attorneys general have been pushing in court.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi's Parlays Drive Back-to-Back $5B Days — and Hand Critics Their Strongest Argument
Kalshi traded a record $5.33 billion on November 7 and $5.36 billion on November 8, with multi-leg parlay-style 'combos' making up roughly 75% of both days' volume. Its 30-day volume topped $100 billion. But the parlay dominance cuts against the platform's legal defense: parlays are a quintessential sportsbook product, and the American Gaming Association has told the Second Circuit that parlays make up about two-thirds of Kalshi's volume and should be treated as sports bets. The implied house edge on 10-plus-leg combos is around 25%, undercutting the argument that these are neutral financial instruments rather than gambling.
Cruz Bill Would Require State or Tribal Approval for Sports Contracts — a Bipartisan Legislative Threat Emerges
Senator Ted Cruz, who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, is preparing a bill that would bar federally regulated prediction markets from offering gambling-tied event contracts, including sports, unless a state or tribal government authorizes them. It would not ban the contracts nationwide but would require platforms to obtain approval jurisdiction by jurisdiction, resembling state-by-state sportsbook regulation. The proposal arrives as Democrats take control of both chambers after the midterms, creating a potential bipartisan reckoning: a Republican committee chair and a newly skeptical Democratic majority both eyeing restrictions on a sector that had relied on federal protection.
CFTC Tells Platforms to Stop Geofencing States — Directly Colliding With State Court Orders
The CFTC issued an interpretation on November 5 of its 'impartial access' core principle, telling regulated exchanges including Kalshi and Polymarket to drop state-by-state geographic blocks within 30 days or explain why they cannot. The demand collides head-on with existing state court orders that require the platforms to geofence: Washington ordered Kalshi to geofence in August, and Michigan ordered it to use licensed geolocation to block the state in September, with a $500,000 daily fine for violations. Chairman Michael Selig framed the interpretation as a uniformity requirement. The platforms are now caught between a federal demand to unblock states and state court orders to block them.