Spain Initiates Disciplinary Proceedings Against Polymarket and Kalshi; Third Country to Block in 10 Days
Spain's gaming regulator ordered ISPs to block Polymarket and Kalshi access on May 26, 2026, opening formal disciplinary proceedings against both platforms for offering unlicensed betting products. Spain joins India and Indonesia in a coordinated 10-day wave of international blocking actions.
Spain's General Directorate for the Regulation of Gambling (DGOJ) initiated formal disciplinary proceedings against Polymarket and Kalshi on May 26, 2026 and ordered Spanish internet service providers to block access to both platforms. Spain classifies event-contract trading as unlicensed online betting under its 2011 Gaming Act, which requires a national license for any operator offering gambling products to Spanish residents. Neither Polymarket nor Kalshi holds the required license; Spanish regulators argue this makes both platforms criminal-law violators regardless of their US regulatory status.
Spain is the third country in ten days to take blocking action. India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology blocked Polymarket on May 22 under the Promotion and Regulation of Online Gaming Act 2025, and signaled that a Kalshi order would follow. Indonesia issued a parallel blocking order earlier in the same week. The three jurisdictions are unrelated in legal framework but converging on the same policy outcome: classify event contracts as gambling, deny exemption for foreign regulatory licenses, and use ISP-level blocking as the enforcement tool. None of the three offered the platforms a path to compliance through local licensing.
The international containment trajectory matters because Polymarket and Kalshi have been positioning themselves as globally accessible derivatives venues. Polymarket's international platform (the original, separate from the QCEX-licensed US product) drove most of the company's growth through 2025 and into 2026. India was the fastest-growing international market last year. Spain is smaller in absolute terms but symbolically significant as the first EU member state to formally block; the question is whether other EU regulators (BaFin in Germany, AMF in France, CySEC in Cyprus) follow the Spanish framework. None has formally moved yet. EU members generally coordinate on financial-services regulation through ESMA, but gambling regulation is explicitly carved out as a member-state competence, which is why Spain can act unilaterally without triggering EU-level proceedings.
For the platforms the operational response is constrained. ISP-level blocking can be circumvented through VPN use, and prior data from comparable jurisdictions suggests 60 to 80 percent of motivated users find workarounds within weeks. The deeper damage is to institutional credibility and to compliance frameworks the platforms need for US relaunch under QCEX. A CFTC-licensed exchange that is simultaneously being blocked as illegal gambling in three sovereign jurisdictions has a harder story to tell to US prudential regulators, to potential institutional investors, and (most importantly) to the federal courts now deciding the US state preemption cases. The international actions create a narrative that prediction-market platforms are operating in regulatory gray areas everywhere except where US federal law has unambiguously protected them, which is exactly the framing state attorneys general have been pushing in court.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi Suspends Congressional Candidate for Trading on Own Race — Senate Already Banned Members
Kalshi disclosed on August 31 that it suspended North Carolina congressional candidate Laurie Buckhout for three years and fined her $2,589 for trading on her own race — the first publicly known enforcement action against a candidate for prediction market insider trading. Kalshi said it found multiple politicians trading on races they were involved in, including former Congressman George Santos. The Senate had unanimously banned its members and staffers from prediction market trading on April 30. CNN published a major feature on September 24 documenting election officials' concerns about disinformation and insider trading risk from prediction markets as the midterms approach.
Pew Research: Prediction Market Volume Doubled May-July, Sports Now Largest Category
A Pew Research Center analysis published September 23 found that combined monthly trading volume on Kalshi and Polymarket more than doubled from May to July 2026 — rising from $26 billion in May to $53 billion in July — driven primarily by sports contracts. Sports is now the largest trading category on both platforms. During the FIFA World Cup in June and July, Kalshi's monthly sports volume reached $58 billion. Over the same period, Americans wagered roughly $40 billion at licensed sportsbooks — suggesting prediction market sports volume has approached or exceeded licensed sports betting in dollar terms.
Democrats Now 60% Senate, 90% House Favorites on Prediction Markets — Biggest Shift Since 2024
Prediction markets on Kalshi and Polymarket have moved decisively toward Democratic control of both congressional chambers in the 2026 midterms. Democrats are priced at approximately 60% to win Senate control (Republicans 40%) and roughly 90% to win House control as of September 21. Republicans had been at 80%+ in Senate control markets when the market opened in November 2024. The shift began in February 2026 following the Iran war and has accelerated through fall as rising gas prices pushed Trump's approval ratings lower. More than 500 active midterm markets are live across Kalshi and Polymarket combined.