Kalshi Has $6.7B in World Cup Volume — Bank of America Now Estimates $12-13B by the Final
Two weeks into the 2026 FIFA World Cup, Kalshi reports $6.7 billion in total World Cup trading volume, with a Bank of America analyst note estimating the platform will reach $12-13 billion by the July 19 final. Polymarket's soccer category crossed $2 billion in its first ten days alone, a 300% jump on pre-tournament levels with daily volume hitting $220 million. The numbers already eclipse the most optimistic pre-tournament projections.
Two weeks into the 2026 FIFA World Cup, the volume numbers coming out of the two major US prediction-market platforms are well past the optimistic end of pre-tournament estimates. Kalshi reports $6.7 billion in total World Cup trading volume, and a Bank of America analyst note puts the full-tournament figure at $12-13 billion by the July 19 final at MetLife Stadium in New Jersey. Polymarket's soccer category crossed $2 billion in its first ten days — a 300% jump compared to the equivalent period before kickoff — with daily volume in the category climbing from roughly $53 million to $220 million. Our pre-tournament piece projected record levels going in; the actual mid-tournament numbers are a different order of magnitude.
The two platforms are accumulating volume in structurally different ways, which tells you something about their user bases. Kalshi's open interest hit a record $1.16 billion during the tournament, meaning traders are holding positions over time — longer-horizon bets on who wins the group, who advances to the semifinals, who wins the title. Polymarket's overall open interest has remained relatively flat even as volume spiked, which implies heavy turnover: traders rotating in and out of positions on individual matches and short-dated contracts, closer to how a recreational bettor uses a sportsbook. Neither profile is obviously better — Kalshi's compounding OI suggests the emerging of larger directional traders, Polymarket's high-turnover pattern reflects the broader consumer base the World Cup attracts.
The podcast and media integration has accelerated alongside the volume. Polymarket teamed with Dear Media to launch 'What Are the Odds?', a weekly show with rotating celebrity hosts including Claudia and Jackie Oshry, Amanda Hirsch, and Heather McMahan, designed to make prediction-market odds accessible to a non-financial audience. Kalshi is partnering with the Men in Blazers Media Network for 'Night Cup' — a World Cup nightly recap with Roger Bennett — and a Kalshi-backed segment called 'Why Everyone Suddenly Believes' that tracks how market odds shift during the tournament. The media integrations are distribution plays: if prediction-market odds appear in mainstream sports coverage, the top of the acquisition funnel moves from finance-adjacent audiences to sports fans generally.
Two numbers worth keeping in mind as the knockout rounds approach. Spain remains the favorite across both platforms for the title market, the contract with the most aggregate volume in the tournament. Polymarket alone has $28 million or more concentrated on the Golden Boot market. Both figures will grow substantially as the field narrows and the stakes on individual outcomes increase. Bank of America's $12-13 billion Kalshi estimate was published before the round of 16 — the knockout-stage concentration effect, where every remaining match carries more weight, typically drives a second volume surge in the back half of any tournament. The question now is not whether this becomes the largest prediction-market event ever staged. It already is.
Operators mentioned in this article
Recent updates
Kalshi's Parlays Drive Back-to-Back $5B Days — and Hand Critics Their Strongest Argument
Kalshi traded a record $5.33 billion on November 7 and $5.36 billion on November 8, with multi-leg parlay-style 'combos' making up roughly 75% of both days' volume. Its 30-day volume topped $100 billion. But the parlay dominance cuts against the platform's legal defense: parlays are a quintessential sportsbook product, and the American Gaming Association has told the Second Circuit that parlays make up about two-thirds of Kalshi's volume and should be treated as sports bets. The implied house edge on 10-plus-leg combos is around 25%, undercutting the argument that these are neutral financial instruments rather than gambling.
Cruz Bill Would Require State or Tribal Approval for Sports Contracts — a Bipartisan Legislative Threat Emerges
Senator Ted Cruz, who chairs the Senate Commerce Committee, is preparing a bill that would bar federally regulated prediction markets from offering gambling-tied event contracts, including sports, unless a state or tribal government authorizes them. It would not ban the contracts nationwide but would require platforms to obtain approval jurisdiction by jurisdiction, resembling state-by-state sportsbook regulation. The proposal arrives as Democrats take control of both chambers after the midterms, creating a potential bipartisan reckoning: a Republican committee chair and a newly skeptical Democratic majority both eyeing restrictions on a sector that had relied on federal protection.
CFTC Tells Platforms to Stop Geofencing States — Directly Colliding With State Court Orders
The CFTC issued an interpretation on November 5 of its 'impartial access' core principle, telling regulated exchanges including Kalshi and Polymarket to drop state-by-state geographic blocks within 30 days or explain why they cannot. The demand collides head-on with existing state court orders that require the platforms to geofence: Washington ordered Kalshi to geofence in August, and Michigan ordered it to use licensed geolocation to block the state in September, with a $500,000 daily fine for violations. Chairman Michael Selig framed the interpretation as a uniformity requirement. The platforms are now caught between a federal demand to unblock states and state court orders to block them.