● Live Wisconsin AG suit vs Kalshi & Polymarket pending · NY/IL insider-trading orders in effect · Updated May 2026
← News & Updates
Regulation

Minnesota Becomes First US State to Criminalize Prediction Markets; CFTC Sues to Block the Law

Governor Tim Walz signed SF 4760 on May 19, 2026, making it a felony for prediction market operators to serve Minnesota residents starting August 1. The CFTC filed suit in federal district court the next day, arguing the law is preempted by the Commodity Exchange Act.

On May 19, 2026, Minnesota Governor Tim Walz signed SF 4760, an omnibus public-safety bill that absorbed the standalone prediction-market ban originally introduced as SF 4511. The statute makes it a felony to operate an event-contract platform inside Minnesota starting August 1, 2026, and reaches markets on athletic events, elections, weather, war, terrorism, public health crises, court cases, deaths, assassinations, entertainment, statements by named individuals, and dice or card games. Agricultural weather hedging and traditional securities and commodities are explicitly carved out. Operating a VPN or other service that facilitates Minnesota residents accessing a banned platform is separately prohibited. Minnesota is the first US state to enact a felony-level criminal ban on prediction markets, and the breadth of the statute (operators, facilitators, and the markets themselves) goes well beyond the civil challenges previously brought by other state attorneys general.

On May 20, less than 24 hours after the signing, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission filed suit in the US District Court for the District of Minnesota, seeking a preliminary injunction to block the law before its August 1 effective date. The complaint argues that the Commodity Exchange Act gives the CFTC exclusive jurisdiction over derivatives listed on a Designated Contract Market, and that state gaming laws cannot criminalize conduct on a federally licensed exchange any more than they could ban S&P 500 futures. CFTC Chairman Michael Selig was unusually direct in the agency's statement: "This Minnesota law turns lawful operators and participants in prediction markets into felons overnight." The framing matters because Selig is asking the court not just to enjoin the statute but to treat the question as a clean federal-supremacy issue rather than a closer call on traditional state gambling powers.

Kalshi's response, posted on X within an hour of Walz's signature, compared the ban to "trying to ban the New York Stock Exchange." Polymarket has not issued a public statement. Both platforms remain accessible in Minnesota today, along with Robinhood (which routes orders through Kalshi and its own MIAXdx DCM, both covered by the ban), Manifold, and PredictIt. None of the operators has publicly committed to a post-August-1 plan, which is itself a signal: a clear "we will continue serving Minnesota residents" statement would be a useful talking point in the federal litigation, and its absence suggests legal counsel is keeping options open while the court considers the preliminary injunction motion.

The Minnesota fight is the cleanest preemption test the industry has faced. Kalshi won a federal court ruling against the CFTC itself in 2025 over the agency's attempt to block sports contracts; this time the agency is on Kalshi's side of the same argument, applied to a state instead of a federal counterparty. Minnesota Attorney General Keith Ellison will argue that SF 4760 is a gambling statute, not a securities statute, and that the state's traditional police power over wagering survives the CFTC's licensing authority. If the District of Minnesota rules for the CFTC, the case heads to the Eighth Circuit and likely the Supreme Court, but every other state legislature with a pending bill (Massachusetts and New Jersey both have similar measures in committee) gets a signal to wait. If Minnesota wins even at the preliminary-injunction stage, expect a wave of copycat bans before the November midterm cycle. For Minnesota residents holding open positions, the practical question is whether to wind down before August 1 or trust the federal court to step in; we cover that decision in detail on our Minnesota state page.

Recent updates


Google Bans Prediction-Market Ads in Ohio — Second State After Nevada, and Regulators Weren't Told First

Google updated its US prediction-markets advertising policy to prohibit ads for prediction-market contracts in Ohio, effective June 2, 2026. Ohio joins Nevada as the only states excluded since Google opened the category in January. The Ohio Casino Control Commission says it did not request the ban — adding a new, private-sector front to a fight that has so far run through courts and statehouses.

Kalshi Scrubs 'Bookmaking' and 'Sports Betting' From Its USPTO Filings — the Vocabulary Is Now a Legal Strategy

Kalshi's May trademark filings replaced the gambling terminology of its November 2025 USPTO submissions — which described 'bookmaking services' and 'sports betting and gambling tournaments' — with 'prediction market services' and 'trades and wagers.' The reframing lands while six state preemption suits, a pending CFTC rule, and a Congressional insider-trading probe all turn on exactly one question: is this product a financial instrument or a bet?

The 2026 World Cup Is the First Mega-Event for US Prediction Markets — Kalshi and Polymarket Hit Record $7B Weekly Volume Going In

The 2026 FIFA World Cup kicks off June 11 in Mexico City with global wagers projected to top $50 billion — the biggest betting event in history. It is also the first World Cup where US traders can use prediction markets at full scale: Kalshi and Polymarket entered the week at a record $7 billion in combined weekly volume, Kalshi lists nearly 500 tournament markets, and a SEON survey puts prediction markets second only to licensed sportsbooks as the preferred way to bet the tournament.