Prediction Markets
in Minnesota
On May 19, 2026, Governor Tim Walz signed SF 4760, making Minnesota the first US state to criminalize prediction market operators. The CFTC sued the following day in federal district court, arguing the law is preempted by the Commodity Exchange Act. Until the case is decided, every major platform is still live in Minnesota: the ban takes effect August 1, 2026, and a preliminary injunction motion is pending. The state's 9.85% top income tax rate (already among the highest in the US) still applies to any net profits booked before then.
Minnesota signed SF 4760 yesterday. The CFTC sued today.
The law makes operating a prediction market in Minnesota a felony as of August 1, 2026, and reaches markets on elections, sports, weather, war, terrorism, public health, court cases, deaths, entertainment, statements by named individuals, and dice or card games. Operating a VPN-based workaround is separately prohibited. The CFTC complaint, filed in the District of Minnesota, argues the Commodity Exchange Act gives federal regulators exclusive jurisdiction over CFTC-licensed Designated Contract Markets and seeks a preliminary injunction before the August deadline.
Read full coverage → Litigation scoreboard →Which platforms work in Minnesota right now?
All five major platforms are accessible today. Whether they remain accessible after August 1, 2026 depends on the federal court's ruling on the CFTC's preliminary injunction motion. None of the operators has publicly committed to either continuing service or exiting Minnesota in the event the injunction is denied.
Available today, but the new Minnesota law (SF 4760) makes operating in MN a felony starting August 1, 2026. Kalshi has indicated it will continue serving Minnesota users while the CFTC lawsuit plays out.
QCEX-licensed US product available today via waitlist. Same August 1 cliff applies. Polymarket has not issued a public statement on Minnesota access after that date.
Play-money Mana and Sweepcash both fall under the broad statutory language. Status after August 1 unclear pending court ruling.
CFTC no-action exemption does not preempt state law on its face. PredictIt has not signaled its Minnesota plans.
Sports, economic and political event contracts available today. Robinhood routes orders through Kalshi and MIAXdx (a Robinhood-owned DCM); both are covered by the ban.
Why the federal court case will decide everything
The Minnesota law and the CFTC lawsuit set up the cleanest test yet of whether a federal Designated Contract Market license preempts a state gambling statute. Kalshi already won a parallel preemption argument against the CFTC itself in 2025 when the agency tried to block its sports contracts. This time the agency is on Kalshi's side, arguing that its own licensees cannot be criminalized by individual states.
Minnesota's counter-argument leans on the state's traditional police power over wagering. Attorney General Keith Ellison's office will argue SF 4760 is a gambling statute (not a securities statute) and falls inside an area where states have always had primary authority. The court has to decide whether event contracts on a CFTC-licensed exchange are commodity derivatives (federal) or bets dressed up as derivatives (state).
Whichever way the District of Minnesota rules, the loser appeals to the Eighth Circuit and likely to the Supreme Court. The preliminary injunction question is faster: the CFTC needs the court to pause the August 1 effective date while the underlying case is litigated, otherwise platforms have to make a real decision about Minnesota access within ten weeks of this writing.
Arizona just lost the same fight. On May 5, 2026 US District Judge Michael Liburdi granted the CFTC a preliminary injunction blocking AG Kris Mayes from prosecuting Kalshi under Arizona's gambling laws. The court found three independent grounds for preemption: field preemption (CFTC has exclusive jurisdiction over DCM derivatives), conflict preemption (state enforcement obstructs Congressional intent), and impossibility preemption (CFTC rules require open access while AZ law criminalizes unlicensed wagering). The reasoning translates almost directly to Minnesota.
Our read: the Arizona ruling materially shifts the odds. The District of Minnesota is not bound by Judge Liburdi's reasoning, but the three-pronged preemption analysis is well-developed and persuasive, and the CFTC will lead with it. We now read a preliminary injunction as the heavily favored outcome before August 1, not just the most likely one. The remaining risk is timing: if the court schedules the hearing late, platforms still face a brief decision window. Ellison's office has not yet signaled whether it will try to distinguish Arizona on the criminalization-of-participants point (SF 4760 reaches "supportive services" more broadly than Arizona's statute did), which is the strongest available counter-argument.
Planning around an uncertain August 1
Three reasonable approaches depending on your risk tolerance:
- Wind down long-dated positions before August 1. If the injunction is denied and platforms exit Minnesota, you may end up holding contracts you cannot manage. Resolution-on-platform is fine; the risk is mid-trade access loss.
- Withdraw funds before the deadline. Even if the platforms remain accessible via the CFTC's injunction, withdrawal mechanics may be disrupted in a transition window. Pull anything you do not actively need in the book.
- Document your trading history. Export full CSV records from each platform now. If platforms exit Minnesota, post-departure access to historical statements is uncertain, and you still need them for the 2026 tax year.
Note that the law does not criminalize traders, only operators. There is no legal exposure to using a platform today, and even after August 1, the question is whether the platforms themselves can serve Minnesota residents.
Minnesota's 9.85% top rate still applies to pre-ban gains
Minnesota has the 4th-highest state income tax rate in the US at 9.85% on income above ~$183,000 (single filers) as of 2026. Prediction market winnings are ordinary income. Combining federal (up to 37%) and Minnesota state tax, high earners can face effective rates above 47% on net profits. This applies to every dollar booked before August 1, 2026, regardless of what happens to platform access after.
Kalshi issues a 1099-MISC for net annual profits. Report on your Minnesota state return as ordinary income. Sports betting losses are subject to the 2026 OBBBA 90% deductibility cap; Kalshi prediction market losses are not subject to this cap (commodity derivatives, not sports wagers). If your activity is significant, a Minnesota CPA familiar with the federal/state interaction is worth the fee, especially given the unusual tax-year mid-cycle change in market access.
How Minnesota compares to nearby states
Wisconsin
Active state AG lawsuit against all major platforms (filed April 2026). Wisconsin and Minnesota are now the two most hostile states for prediction markets in the upper Midwest.
Neighbor stateIowa
Open status, all platforms available. Iowa was among the first states to launch mobile sports betting in 2019. Lower 6% flat tax.
No income taxSouth Dakota
No state income tax: prediction market winnings subject to federal taxes only. Open status. Closest tax-efficient option for displaced MN traders.